Monthly Archives: October 2009

Textbook Publishers Launch National Database to Help Students with Disabilities Succeed in College

AccessText Network Improves Students’ Access to College Textbook Content
WASHINGTON, Oct. 29 /PRNewswire/ — The Association of American Publishers (AAP) has launched a new comprehensive national online database to make it easier and quicker for students with print-related disabilities, such as blindness or dyslexia, to obtain the alternative textbooks they need for their college courses.

The AccessText Network, developed in conjunction with the Alternative Media Access Center (AMAC) at the University of Georgia, has more than 300,000 textbook and novel titles available in alternative formats for students with disabilities.  More than 650 colleges and universities have enrolled to participate in the system.

“Before AccessText, students with disabilities often waited weeks or even months for these alternative textbooks, sometimes getting their materials only after their classes were well underway,” said Tom Allen, president and chief executive officer of AAP, whose higher education member publishers donated almost $1 million to fund the non-profit venture.  “Now, the AccessText Network is streamlining the permission process and facilitating quick access to content for these students.  It has leveled the playing field, setting students with disabilities on a course for success from their first day of class.”

Christopher Lee, director of AMAC at the University of Georgia, which operates the AccessText Network, said the new network is fulfilling orders for students in about four days on average. “And every day we’re adding more textbook titles and signing up more schools to participate, making us more effective for both disability service providers and students,” Lee said.

Since going live Aug. 24, the AccessText Network has fulfilled more than 3,000 requests for alternative format textbooks.

“Textbook publishers are dedicated to helping all students succeed, and we are proud to see the AccessText Network help make college education a reality for thousands of college students with disabilities,” Allen said.

The AccessText Network is being funded through donations from publishers Bedford/St. Martin’s, W.H. Freeman, and Worth Publishers; Cengage Learning; CQ Press; McGraw-Hill Education; W.W. Norton; Pearson; Reed Elsevier Inc.; and John Wiley & Sons.

AccessText Network
AccessText is a membership-based online database system that provides quick access to information about publishers’ course materials and speeds the process through which institutions request electronic versions of course materials for students with print disabilities or the permission to scan these course materials.  The AccessText Network can be found at www.AccessText.org.

The Association of American Publishers
The Association of American Publishers is the national trade association of the U.S. book publishing industry. AAP’s more than 300 members include most of the major commercial publishers in the United States, as well as smaller and non-profit publishers, university presses and scholarly societies.  AAP’s Higher Education group represents the needs and interests of member publishers who produce instructional materials including textbooks and digital products and services for the post-secondary educational market.

AMAC
The Alternative Media Access Center (AMAC), an initiative of the University System of Georgia, is committed to removing barriers and providing access to knowledge for individuals with physical, sensory, and learning print-related disabilities.

CONTACT:  Katie Test of AAP, +1-202-220-4556, or Christopher Lee of AMAC, +1-866-418-2750

The Nation’s Best Math and Science Students Earn Top High School Honors and Strive for $100,000 Scholarship

Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology Regional Finalists Head to Georgia Institute of Technology November 6 & 7

ATLANTA, Oct. 29 /PRNewswire/ –

WHAT:    Could tomorrow’s Albert Einstein or Alexander Graham Bell
currently be a student in high school? What did the next
generation of innovators come up with this year? Find out when
the regional finalists of the 2009 Siemens Competition in Math,
Science & Technology – America’s premier science research
competition – head to Georgia Institute of Technology November 6
& 7. At stake is a $3,000 prize for one individual, $6,000 for
one team, and an invitation to the National Finals in New York
City for a shot at the $100,000 Grand Prize!

WHO:     Sixteen whiz kids unveil graduate level research projects to a
distinguished panel of university judges. Past Siemens
Competition winners and Alumni have tackled some of the world’s
hardest and most pressing problems through math and science.
Their feats include: invention of anti-bacterial coatings for
medical devices, research of cures for drug-resistant
Tuberculosis, exploring zebrafish spines for an inside look at
bone growth, reinventing string theory, and developing a device
to generate energy from ocean waves. What research will the
Nation’s brightest teen minds unveil this year?

The 2009 Siemens Competition regional finalists are:

Individual Finalists:
———————
– Tian-Yi Jiang, North Carolina School of Science and
Mathematics, Durham, NC
– Aryan Khojandi, Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and
Technology, Alexandria, VA
– Lanair Lett, North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics,
Durham, NC
– Darpan Patel, Joseph Wheeler High School, Marietta, GA
– Jinge Su, North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics,
Durham NC

Team Finalists:
—————
– Jonathan Bryan and Linus Liang, Oak Ridge High School, Oak
Ridge, TN
– Di Deng and Patrick Yang, North Carolina School of Science and
Mathematics, Durham, NC
– Xinran Liu and Grace Prazniak, Oak Ridge High School, Oak
Ridge, TN
– Neil Shah, Northwest Guilford High School, Greensboro, NC; and
Yekaterina Shpanskaya, Math and Science School (Home School),
Raleigh, NC
– Shawn Tang, Brian Chiang and Eric Walsh, Troy High School,
Fullerton, CA

WHERE:   Georgia Institute of Technology
Georgia Tech Hotel & Conference Center
800 Spring Street NW
Atlanta, GA

WHEN:    Friday, Nov. 6 (Conference Room B)
10:30 am – 11:30 am: Students set up projects
5:00 pm – 6:30 pm: Public viewing of projects
Saturday, Nov. 7 (Georgia Tech Global Learning Center
Amphitheater 222)
7:30 am – 1:00 pm: Students present to judges

MORE:    Want to be the first to find out who will head to the National
Finals in New York?

Log into and follow Siemens Foundation on Twitter
(http://twitter.com/SFoundation) on Saturday, November 7, 2009
between 7:00 pm and 9:30 pm EST, when we announce the winners
live!

The Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology is a signature program of the Siemens Foundation, which provides more than $7 million in support of educational initiatives in the areas of science, technology, engineering and math in the United States. The Siemens Competition is administered by the College Board. More information can be found at www.siemens-foundation.org.

Winners of the regional events are invited to compete at the National Finals at New York University in New York City, December 3 – December 7, 2009. Visit www.siemens-foundation.org on December 7, 2009 at 9:30 am EST to view a live webcast of the National Finalist Award Presentation.

Interviews and Photo Ops available with students, judges and Siemens Foundation executives

CONTACT: Valerie Francois, Siemens Foundation, +1-732-590-5292, cell +1-609-721-3713, valerie.francois@siemens.com; or Alexander Aizenberg, Weber Shandwick, +1-212-445-8414, cell +1-908-723-4807, aaizenberg@webershandwick.com

The Nation’s Best Math and Science Students Earn Top High School Honors and Strive for $100,000 Scholarship

Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology Regional Finalists Head to Massachusetts Institute of Technology November 6 & 7

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Oct. 29 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ –

WHAT:
Could tomorrow’s Albert Einstein or Alexander Graham Bell currently be a student in high school? What did the next generation of innovators come up with this year? Find out when the regional finalists of the 2009 Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology – America’s premier science research competition – head to Massachusetts Institute of Technology November 6 & 7. At stake is a $3,000 prize for one individual, $6,000 for one team, and an invitation to the National Finals in New York City for a shot at the $100,000 Grand Prize!

WHO:
Fifteen whiz kids unveil graduate level research projects to a distinguished panel of university judges. Past Siemens Competition winners and Alumni have tackled some of the world’s hardest and most pressing problems through math and science. Their feats include: invention of anti-bacterial coatings for medical devices, research of cures for drug-resistant Tuberculosis, exploring zebrafish spines for an inside look at bone growth, reinventing string theory, and developing a device to generate energy from ocean waves. What research will the Nation’s brightest teen minds unveil this year?

The 2009 Siemens Competition regional finalists are:
Individual Finalists:
•    Preetam Dutta, Jonathan Law High School, Milford, CT
•    Richard Ebright, North Brunswick Township High School, North Brunswick, NJ
•    Minhye Kim, Brookline High School, Brookline, MA
•    Tim Kunisky, Livingston High School, NJ
•    William Newberry, Greenwich High School, Greenwich, CT

Team Finalists:
•    Roger Curley and Dalton Wu, Montgomery Blair High School, Silver Spring, MD
•    Brittney Joyce and Andrew Walsh, Lexington High School, Lexington, MA
•    Keenan Monks, Hazleton Area High School, Hazleton, PA; and Benjamin Kraft, Liberty High School, Bethlehem, PA
•    Benjamin Song and Quan Chen, Methacton High School, Eagleville, PA
•    Jennifer Wang, Montgomery Blair High School, Silver Spring, MD; and Grace Young, The Potomac School, McLean, VA

WHERE:
On the campus of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

WHEN:
Friday, Nov. 6 – Twenty Chimneys Room, 3rd Floor, Stratton Student Center
Bldg W20, 84 Massachusetts Avenue

9:45 am – 11:00 am: Students set up projects
5:00 pm – 6:30 pm: Public viewing of projects

Saturday, Nov. 7 – Mezzanine Lounge, 3rd Floor, Stratton Student Center
Bldg W20, 84 Massachusetts Avenue

8:00 am – 1:15 pm: Students present to judges

MORE:
Want to be the first to find out who will head to the National Finals in New York?

Log into and follow Siemens Foundation on Twitter (http://twitter.com/SFoundation) on Saturday, November 7, 2009 between 7:00 pm and 10:00 pm EST, when we announce the winners live!

The Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology is a signature program of the Siemens Foundation, which provides more than $7 million in support of educational initiatives in the areas of science, technology, engineering and math in the United States. The Siemens Competition is administered by the College Board. More information can be found at www.siemens-foundation.org.

Winners of the regional events are invited to compete at the National Finals at New York University in New York City, December 3 – December 7, 2009. Visit www.siemens-foundation.org on December 7, 2009 at 9:30 am EST to view a live webcast of the National Finalist Award Presentation.

Interviews and Photo Ops available with students, judges and Siemens Foundation executives

CONTACT: Valerie Francois, Siemens Foundation, +1-732-590-5292, cell +1-609-721-3713, valerie.francois@siemens.com; or Judy Huang, Weber Shandwick, +1-212-445-8346, cell +1-617-359-1938, jyhuang@webershandwick.com

Campus Management’s Customers Doing the Talking at EDUCAUSE Conference

Innovative Administrative Systems Provider Adds a Twist to Tradeshow

BOCA RATON, Fla., Oct. 29 /PRNewswire/ — Campus Management Corp® announced it is presenting with Indiana University on Wednesday, November 4 at the 2009 EDUCAUSE Annual Conference in Denver.  The presentation focuses on IU’s vision for “Lifetime Communications,” a project that makes IU the first major, multi-campus university in the nation to elevate constituent communications to a university-wide platform inclusive of all schools, its alumni association and foundation.

For Campus Management, IU is just one of several institutions involved in the company’s unique approach to the largest event of its kind in Higher Education.

“Budgets are a very real problem across Higher Education, and this show must be about more than who has the biggest, brightest booth,” said Tim Gilbert, chief marketing officer and senior vice president of Campus Management Corp. “IT and administrators want the real story about what they gain from a particular investment, they need vendors to be transparent and talk about what you can do with their products in real-world situations.”

To that end, Campus Management invited its clients to manage its booth at EDUCAUSE.  Customers from A.T. Still University, IUPUI, University of Alabama, and University of Ottawa will be showcasing their success using various Campus Management products and services.

The institutions will highlight products like CampusVue® Student, a Student Information System featuring a new and highly automated financial aid processing module, and Talisma® CRM, the leading strategic enrollment management software for Higher Education.

For more details, visit www.campusmanagement.com/EDUCAUSE.  Find Campus Management and its customers in booth 433 in the exhibit hall.

About Campus Management Corp
More than 1,700 colleges, universities, foundations, and other companies in 35 countries rely upon Campus Management Corp® enterprise software products and services. Campus Management’s CampusVue® Ecosystem is a fully integrated, centralized administrative and e-learning platform that unifies services, academic delivery, administrative management and reporting for a full range of public, private and proprietary postsecondary institutions.

Campus Management’s award-winning student information system is used by more than 75 percent of the largest US-based proprietary career and online colleges. Additional offerings include fundraising software, financials, HR solutions, and Talisma® CRM, a leading Constituent Relationship Management (CRM) solution for Higher Education and a range of other industries.  Campus Management employs associates worldwide, providing clients with a full range of consulting, implementation, support, training and integration services. For more information, visit www.campusmanagement.com.

CONTACT:  Lisa Patterson, Corporate Communications Manager, Campus Management Corp, +1-561-241-2193, lpatterson@campusmgmt.com

Student Reporters Invited to Participate in Free Press Teleconference with NBC News Digital Correspondent Mara Schiavocampo

Pursuing a Communications Career in Today’s Challenging Job Market

Opportunity Provides First Look at Programming from Upcoming New York Women in Communications Foundation 2009 Student Career Conference

What:
Student journalists are invited to participate in a 30 minute interactive press teleconference with Mara Schiavocampo, Digital Correspondent, NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams, as she offers insight and advice on how to successfully pursue a career within the rapidly evolving communications industry.

Schiavocampo previews her keynote address from the upcoming New York Women in Communications Foundation 2009 Student Career Conference (Saturday, November 7th at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in New York City) and gives students an advance opportunity to experience a small part of the valuable programming from the conference.

The press teleconference will allow students to participate in a live Q&A with Schiavocampo.  Questions may be submitted both prior to and during the press conference.

When:
Thursday, October 29, 2009
4:00 – 4:30 pm EDT


How:
RSVP required to receive call-in details.

Contact Stephanie Fraiman: 212-297-2129, SFraiman@KellenCompany.com

Details:

About Mara Schiavocampo
Award-winning journalist Mara Schiavocampo is the Digital Correspondent for “NBC Nightly News With Brian Williams,” the first reporter of her kind in network television. A pioneer of new media journalism, Schiavocampo travels the world producing, shooting, reporting and editing video pieces, blogging and shooting still photos. She files reports for all NBC News platforms, including “NBC Nightly News,” “Nightly News” online (www.nightly.msnbc.com), “Today” and MSNBC.  Schiavocampo has been featured as a Special Correspondent for “The Oprah Winfrey Show,” filing international reports and appearing as an on-set guest. She is also a recurring guest commentator on NPR.

About the 2009 Student Communications Career Conference
The full day New York Women in Communications Foundation Student Communications Career Conference will feature panel discussions, career advice, networking opportunities and access to industry experts. Content will focus on evolving disciplines and unfolding opportunities in advertising; marketing; public relations; TV and interactive production; communications entrepreneurship; magazine writing for print and web; newspaper/wire/web reporting; broadcast journalism, and digital, social and mobile media.

Companies represented by speakers include: Associated Press, The New York Times, Good Morning America, TODAYshow.com, AOL, Universal McCann, Dow Jones & Co., Hearst Magazines, GolinHarris, FOX News Channel, Essence Magazine , Polo Ralph Lauren,  Oxygen, The Huffington Post, Nickelodeon Viacom, HBO, New York Daily News, WABC-TV, WOR Radio, Techlicious.com, NY1 News, FutureBrand, Octagon and more.

The Student Communications Career Conference is sponsored by 3M. Panel sessions are sponsored by AOL and NYU School of continuing Professional Studies, Division of Media Industries and Design.

For additional information and to register for the 2009 Student Communications Career Conference, please visit www.nywici.org.

About New York Women in Communications Foundation

New York Women in Communications Foundation, a public charity founded in 2000, exists to help a younger sisterhood successfully enter the world of communications with financial support, professional guidance and ongoing friendship.  An arm of New York Women in Communications, the Foundation awards scholarships and provides educational programs for women, whether just beginning or embarking on a transition in their careers. It is the largest foundation for communications scholarships for women in the tri-state area. For more information, please visit www.nywici.org/foundation.

/PRNewswire — Oct. 28/

South Carolina Gamecocks Beat the Field, Rank No. 1 in 2009 Trojan(R) Sexual Health Report Card

Fourth Annual Trojan Sexual Health Report Card Ranks Access to Sexual Health Resources and Information at Major NCAA Colleges and Universities

PRINCETON, N.J., Oct. 27 /PRNewswire/ — The state of sexual health information and resources at major American colleges and universities was revealed today with the release of the 2009 Trojan® Sexual Health Report Card. The yearly ranking, which measures access and availability of sexual health information and resources across 141 colleges and universities, rates the University of South Carolina number one in making such information available, besting last year’s number one seed Stanford University (2), followed by the University of Connecticut (3), Columbia University (4) and Florida Atlantic University (5).

According to independent research firm Sperling’s BestPlaces, which fielded the study, positive feedback from students, and resources offered by the University of South Carolina health center helped the school rise to the top. Since the Trojan Sexual Health Report Card’s inception four years ago, the Gamecocks have finished no worse than 11th in the country.

“What really impressed us about the University of South Carolina, and what helped the school’s ranking was the high levels of trust students put in the campus health center,” said Bert Sperling, President of Sperling’s BestPlaces. “In fact, trust played a pivotal role in this year’s findings with centers that had higher levels of trust in student polls, like South Carolina’s, tending to score much higher.”

On the other end of the spectrum, DePaul University (141) ranks last in this year’s rankings. Brigham Young University (137), Baylor University (138), Providence College (139) and St. John’s University (140) round out the bottom five.

“Our goal with this study is to increase awareness, spark conversation and get people talking about and advocating positively for sexual health on college campuses,” said Bruce Tetreault, Group Product Manager for Trojan Brand Condoms. “Access to information and resources is critical in allowing students to make informed decisions about their sexual health. We applaud those schools that make this information available to students.”

Schools that improved their rankings include the University of Louisiana-Monroe, which jumped 80 spots to finish at number 29, following a surge of positive student opinion poll responses.

Other big movers in this year’s survey include Dartmouth College (2008: 68; 2009: 19), East Carolina University (2008: 78; 2009: 34), San Diego State University (2008: 105; 2009: 33), and the University of Maryland (2008: 63; 2009: 12).

Report Card Rivalries

The Trojan Sexual Health Report Card analyzes the 141 colleges and universities in the major NCAA conferences, and adds new context to some of the more heated collegiate rivalries.

From a conference wide standpoint, Ivy League schools continued their dominance in the Report Card rankings this year, as the conference most known for its academic prowess saw Columbia, Brown and Cornell University all land in the top ten. This is the first time three Ivies have landed in the top ten since the Report Card was created, and helped contribute to the conference’s 2.98 overall GPA (out of a possible 4.0).

The Big Ten ranked second overall (2.88 GPA) followed by the SEC (2.75), Pac-10 (2.75), ACC (2.73), MAC (2.63), Big 12 (2.58), C-USA (2.51), Mountain West (2.45), Sun Belt (2.38), WAC (2.31) and the Big East (2.17).

Some key findings include:

•    The University of Florida and the University of Oklahoma may have played a close BCS title game on the football field, but for sexual health resources, Florida ran up the score, coming in at 24th overall, compared to Oklahoma’s 81st place ranking.
•    The UConn Huskies, who had a banner year for their men’s and women’s basketball teams, staked their place in the top ten for the second year in a row, as the school achieved a 3.38 GPA, springing them to number 3 in this year’s rankings.
•    The University of Texas-Austin continued their conference dominance, as the Longhorns rank as the highest member from the Big 12, coming in at number 11. The Longhorns have cracked the top 20 of the Trojan Sexual Health Report Card two years in a row.
•    Sunny forecast for the Sunshine State: Five Florida Schools rank in the top 50 of the Sexual Health Report Card this year: Florida Atlantic University, University of Florida, University of Central Florida, Florida International University and the University of South Florida.

Methodology

To develop this year’s rankings, researchers at Sperling’s BestPlaces analyzed data from campus health centers and student opinion polls across 13 separate categories. Based on this analysis, each category was assigned a letter grade and a cumulative GPA was calculated, based on a four point scale.

Sexual Health Report Card Categories:

1.    Student opinion of health center
2.    Health center hours of operation
3.    Availability of patient drop-in vs. appointment only
4.    Availability of separate sexual awareness program
5.    Contraceptive availability and cost
6.    Condom availability and cost
7.    HIV testing, cost and locality (on- vs. off-campus)
8.    Other STI testing, cost and locality (on- vs. off-campus)
9.    Availability of anonymous advice via email / newspaper column
10.    Existence of lecture / outreach programs
11.    Existence of student peer groups
12.    Availability of sexual assault programs
13.    Website usability and functionality

Schools that did well in this year’s Report Card tended to score uniformly high across all categories, while those ranked towards the bottom were less consistent in category grades.

“The Trojan Sexual Health Report Card is an important tool in understanding the availability of sexual health resources and information on campuses across the country,” added Tetreault. “The fact is, only one in three sex acts among singles involves a condom(1). It is our hope that these findings will empower students to advocate for change to ensure sexual health resources and information, including condoms, are consistently and universally available.”

Trojan 2GO®, a new condom two-pack in a thin, protective and discreet plastic case, is the latest innovation from the makers of Trojan Brand Condoms. The new product, which is designed to go anywhere and standup to purses, wallets, pockets and backpacks, is sold at the checkout counters of many drug and convenience retail locations, making it a must-have accessory for any sexually active college student.

Trojan 2GO® is sold for an average suggested retail price of $3.99.

For more information on these products and the Report Card findings, people can visit www.trojancondoms.com. Full Trojan Sexual Health Report Card results are available at the bottom of this release.

(1) Trojan IU Compliance Study 2009; data on file

ABOUT TROJAN® BRAND CONDOMS
TROJAN® Brand Condoms are America’s #1 condom and have been trusted for more than 90 years. TROJAN® Brand Latex Condoms are made from premium quality latex to help reduce the risk of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Every condom is electronically tested to help ensure reliability. There are over 29 varieties of TROJAN® Brand Condoms. More Americans trust the TROJAN® brand than any other condom. For more information visit www.trojancondoms.com.

ABOUT SPERLING’S BESTPLACES
Bert Sperling has been helping people find their own “Best Place” to live, work and retire for more than 20 years. His firm, Sperling’s BestPlaces, puts facts in the hands of the public so they can make better decisions about best places to live, work, retire, play, or relocate. His bestselling books, Cities Ranked and Rated and Best Places to Raise Your Family, are published by John Wiley & Sons.  More information about Bert and his work is available at www.bestplaces.net.

Contact:
Bjorn Trowery, Edelman. 212-704-4556, bjorn.trowery@edelman.com

Allison Goldstein, Edelman. 212-704-4511, allison.goldstein@edelman.com

Complete Trojan Sexual Health Report Card Rankings

Overall Rankings

2009      2009   2008       School                    Conference
Overall     rank   rank
GPA

3.43       1       8  University of South Carolina    SEC
3.40       2       1  Stanford University             PAC 10
3.38       3       6  University of Connecticut       Big East
3.24       4       2  Columbia University             Ivy League
3.23       5      18  Florida Atlantic University     Sun Belt
3.21       6       9  University of Georgia           SEC
3.17       7      36  Michigan State University       Big 10
3.17       8       3  Cornell University              Ivy League
3.15       9      17  Brown University                Ivy League
3.15      10      20  Duke University                 ACC
3.15      11      16  The University of Texas At      Big 12
Austin
3.14      12      63  University of Maryland          ACC
3.13      13      13  University of Michigan          Big 10
3.12      14      26  University of Illinois          Big 10
3.11      15      41  Yale University                 Ivy League
3.08      16      15  Oregon State University         PAC 10
3.01      17      30  North Carolina State            ACC
University
3.01      18      14  Pennsylvania State University   Big 10
3.01      19      68  Dartmouth College               Ivy League
3.00      20       7  West Virginia University        Big East
2.98      21      42  University of Colorado          Big 12
2.98      22      11  University of Oregon            PAC 10
2.97      23      28  Ohio State University           Big 10
2.95      24      47  University of Florida           SEC
2.95      25      56  University of Central Florida   C-USA
2.95      26      12  Louisiana State University      SEC
2.94      27      38  Western Michigan University     MAC
2.94      28      53  University of Virginia          ACC
2.93      29     109  University of Louisiana At      Sun Belt
Monroe
2.93      30      31  Ball State University           MAC
2.92      31       4  University of Iowa              Big 10
2.91      32      24  Mississippi State University    SEC
2.90      33     105  San Diego State University      Mountain West
2.88      34      78  East Carolina University        C-USA
2.87      35      27  University of North Carolina    ACC
2.85      36      75  Florida International           Sun Belt
University
2.84      37      40  University of Southern          PAC 10
California
2.82      38      55  University of Kentucky          SEC
2.82      39      46  Colorado State University       Mountain West
2.81      40      49  The University of Alabama       SEC
2.80      41      51  University of California        PAC 10
2.79      42      50  Northern Illinois University    MAC
2.79      43      35  University of Wisconsin         Big 10
2.79      44      79  Texas A&M University            Big 12
2.78      45      21  University of Pennsylvania      Ivy League
2.77      46      58  Washington State University     PAC 10
2.76      47      84  Kansas State University         Big 12
2.75      48      64  University of Missouri          Big 12
2.74      49      22  Indiana University              Big 10
2.73      50      66  University of South Florida     Big East
2.73      51      33  Bowling Green State University  MAC
2.72      52      32  Rutgers University              Big East
2.72      53      34  Tulane University of Louisiana  C-USA
2.71      54       5  University of Denver            Sun Belt
2.71      55      45  Western Kentucky University     Sun Belt
2.71      56      48  University of Kansas            Big 12
2.70      57      76  University of New Mexico        Mountain West
2.70      58      23  University of Minnesota         Big 10
2.69      59      95  Miami University-Oxford         MAC
2.69      61      83  California State                WAC
University-Fresno
2.69      61      29  Princeton University            Ivy League
2.68      62      25  Harvard University              Ivy League
2.68      63      61  Ohio University                 MAC
2.67      64     n/a  University of Nevada-Reno       WAC
2.67      65     108  University of Mississippi       SEC
2.67      66     101  Clemson University              ACC
2.66      67      65  Rice University                 C-USA
2.65      68      44  University of Miami             ACC
2.65      69      99  University of Louisville        Big East
2.65      70      39  University of Arizona           PAC 10
2.64      71      52  Virginia Tech                   ACC
2.64      72      70  Wake Forest University          ACC
2.62      73     126  Indiana University-Purdue       Independents
University-Indianapolis
2.62      74      62  Eastern Michigan University     MAC
2.62      75      73  University of Pittsburgh        Big East
2.61      76      19  Syracuse University             Big East
2.61      77      54  Purdue University               Big 10
2.60      78      69  University of Southern          C-USA
Mississippi
2.60      79      88  Florida State University        ACC
2.60      80      57  University of North Texas       Sun Belt
2.59      81      92  University of Oklahoma          Big 12
2.58      82      91  Southern Methodist University   C-USA
2.58      83      10  University of Wyoming           Mountain West
2.58      84      87  University of Memphis           C-USA
2.56      85      59  University at Buffalo           MAC
2.56      86      71  San Jose State University       WAC
2.53      87      43  Georgia Tech                    ACC
2.53      88      90  Northwestern University         Big 10
2.52      89      81  Central Michigan University     MAC
2.52      90     123  Texas Tech University           Big 12
2.52      91      74  University of Washington        PAC 10
2.51      92      60  Kent State University           MAC
2.50      93      85  University of Akron             MAC
2.49      94      93  The University of Texas-Pan     Independents
American
2.49      95      94  University of Houston           C-USA
2.48      96      37  University of Nebraska          Big 12
2.47      97      77  University of Nevada-Las Vegas  Mountain West
2.47      98     102  Boise State University          WAC
2.47      99      82  University of Tulsa             C-USA
2.45     100      86  The University of Tennessee     SEC
2.42     101      72  University of Arkansas Main     SEC
Campus
2.38     102     110  Air Force Academy               Mountain West
2.38     103      96  Iowa State University           Big 12
2.36     104     100  University of Arkansas At       Sun Belt
Little Rock
2.35     105     107  University of South Alabama     Sun Belt
2.35     106     129  University of Cincinnati        Big East
2.33     107     104  University of Utah              Mountain West
2.30     108     111  University of Hawaii At Manoa   WAC
2.29     109     121  New Mexico State University     WAC
2.28     110      97  Utah State University           WAC
2.28     111      67  Oklahoma State University       Big 12
2.28     112      80  Vanderbilt University           SEC
2.28     113     119  Arizona State University        PAC 10
2.27     114     106  Texas Christian University      Mountain West
2.26     115      89  The University of Texas At El   C-USA
Paso
2.25     116      98  Middle Tennessee State          Sun Belt
University
2.19     117     131  Utah Valley State College       Independents
2.16     118     117  University of California-Los    PAC 10
Angeles
2.14     119     115  Auburn University               SEC
2.14     120     n/a  The University of Alabama at    C-USA
Birmingham
2.13     121     124  Georgetown University           Big East
2.08     122     112  Savannah State University       Independents
2.05     123     133  University of Toledo            MAC
2.03     124     118  University of New Orleans       Sun Belt
1.94     125     114  Villanova University            Big East
1.93     126     127  Boston College                  ACC
1.93     127     120  Chicago State University        Independents
1.92     128     113  University of Idaho             WAC
1.90     129     130  Marquette University            Big East
1.75     130     136  University of Notre Dame        Big East
1.74     131     128  Marshall University             C-USA
1.71     132     116  Troy State University           Sun Belt
1.71     133     122  Seton Hall University           Big East
1.64     134     135  Louisiana Tech University       WAC
1.63     135     103  University of Louisiana At      Sun Belt
Lafayette
1.58     136     125  Arkansas State University       Sun Belt
1.57     137     132  Brigham Young University        Mountain West
1.54     138     134  Baylor University               Big 12
1.37     139     137  Providence College              Big East
1.24     140     138  St. John’s University           Big East
0.62     141     139  DePaul University               Big East

CONTACT:  Bjorn Trowery, +1-212-704-4556, bjorn.trowery@edelman.com or Allison Goldstein, +1-212-704-4511, allison.goldstein@edelman.com, both of Edelman

University Presidents Call on Washington to Support American Education Abroad

WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — This week the presidents from five major American universities abroad will visit Washington, DC to promote additional federal support and recognition for U.S. higher education around the world.

Presidents David D. Arnold of The American University in Cairo, Peter Armacost of Forman Christian College (Pakistan), Christopher G.L. Hall of the American University in Kosovo, Joseph Jabbra of Lebanese American University, and Celeste Schenck of the American University in Paris will be visiting U.S. government agencies, higher education associations, and media outlets on Monday, October 26th and Tuesday, October 27th on behalf of Association of American International Colleges and Universities (AAICU), an organization that represents twenty-five American institutions of higher learning operating outside of the United States.  AAICU, which is currently headed by American University in Cairo president David Arnold, was founded in 1971.  Conditions for full membership to AAICU include institutional autonomy, an independent board of trustees and accreditation by a major recognized U.S. accrediting authority.

AAICU member institutions educate thousands of students in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Africa and also offer opportunities for American students to receive valuable cross-cultural experiences through education abroad.  AAICU institutions have strong roots in their respective host countries and typically enjoy wide recognition in their international settings.  The presidents assert that the unique position of AAICU’s member institutions makes them ideal for bridging cultures and nations within the framework of the American liberal arts tradition.

CONTACT: Greg Houle, +1-646-244-6969, greg.houle@lau.edu, or Morgan Roth, +1-646-341-7436, mroth@aucnyo.edu, both of Association of American International Colleges and Universities

Most University Presidents Agree Current Athletics Spending is Unsustainable

First-of-Its-Kind Survey Discussed at 20th-Anniversary Knight Commission Meeting Reveals Dilemma of Reform, Overwhelming Agreement on Excessive Coaching Salaries

MIAMI, Oct. 26 /PRNewswire/ — University presidents at institutions with major football programs agree that current spending trends on intercollegiate athletics cannot be sustained nationally and collective action is needed to address escalating costs, a study released at a meeting held by the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics revealed today. More than 80% of Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS, formerly Division 1A) university presidents participated in a survey that examined the presidents’ attitudes and perceptions about the challenges, benefits and costs of supporting intercollegiate athletic programs.

Additional Knight Commission research reveals the subsidies provided by most FBS institutions to their athletics budgets are rising more quickly than educational budgets. This, together with other opinions revealed in the survey, underscores the urgency to address the escalating costs of college sports through collective action, which requires support from presidents, NCAA leadership, university boards of trustees and conferences across the country. The Commission intends to make its own recommendations in a report scheduled to be released next spring. In its deliberations, the Commission will consider the survey findings, additional research published in its online report, College Sports 101 , and the testimonies made by higher education and college sports experts during public meetings held by the Commission over the past year.

Key findings from the presidential survey conducted by Art & Science Group include:
•    Dilemma of reform – While presidents recognize the need for reform, there is a lack of clear consensus about the best way to effect change.  Nearly three-quarters believe that athletics present unique challenges as compared to other areas of the university when trying to control costs on their own campus.  A majority believe institutions must act collectively to address these escalating costs.
•    Sustainability – Less than a quarter of presidents believe intercollegiate athletics are sustainable in their current form at FBS institutions nationally. Two-thirds view their own programs as sustainable; but nearly half (48%) express concern that the current economic outlook will affect the number of varsity sports their institution can support in the future.
•    Salaries – When asked about salaries across FBS institutions nationally, an overwhelming majority (85%) of FBS presidents indicate they feel compensation is excessive for football and basketball coaches. Viewed as the greatest impediment to sustainability, coaches’ salaries are costs that are difficult to control.
•    Growing Divide between Haves and Have-Nots – A major concern is the growing imbalance between financially strong and weak programs. Presidents of less competitive institutions feel that their programs are unfairly exploited.
•    Transparency – More than 80% of presidents believe greater financial transparency is needed.
•    Benefits of Athletics – College presidents perceive athletic success provides substantial benefits to the institution, such as generating higher levels of fundraising, attracting better qualified students, enhancing school spirit and raising the profile of the institution. Although research generally does not support a significant correlation between athletic success and increased donations or better student quality, FBS university presidents are swayed by personal experience that there are cross-institutional benefits of winning sports programs.

“The presidential research findings are eye-opening and raise concerns, but I am encouraged that we find ourselves in an environment ready for change,” said Knight Commission co-chairman William E. “Brit” Kirwan, Chancellor of University System of Maryland. “The Commission will deliberate over the next several months before issuing specific recommendations early next year.  However, we believe evidence continues to support the need for greater financial transparency and will consider ways this can be achieved.  Academic reform in college sports hit a tipping point when graduation rates were first shared publically in the early 1990s, and the same can hold true with greater disclosure of ballooning athletics costs in relationship to institutional budgets.”

“It’s important that a majority of presidents support collective action to address financial pressures.  We have heard the same call from athletics directors who deal with these issues on the front lines,” said Knight Commission co-chairman R. Gerald Turner, President of Southern Methodist University.

Potential solutions as well as an assessment of whether the current structure is equipped to address the mounting problems were discussed today at a meeting held in Miami that commemorated the 20th anniversary of the Knight Commission’s founding. Former NCAA President Cedric W. Dempsey and The Ohio State University Athletics Director Eugene D. Smith both echoed the environment ready for change but propose different solutions.

Smith noted that athletic directors have been forced to become entrepreneurs and urged continued control of athletics by university presidents. “The presidents at the end of the day are in control, and the athletic directors need to help them,” Smith said. “We need to come up with strategies that help the have-nots so they can sustain their missions.”

Big Ten Commissioner James E. Delany warned the Knight Commission, “Cost-cutting is a contact sport in a conflict-rich environment.”

Dutch Baughman, executive director of the Division IA Athletic Directors Association, said his group is proposing immediate cost-cutting reforms. He acknowledged they are among the “low-hanging fruit.” Among the reforms are smaller traveling squads, the elimination of foreign travel for athletics, banning off-campus hotel stays before a home game, restrictions on Web site expansion, and placing limits on sport team staff hiring.

Also unveiled today is College Sports 101, an interactive, Web-based report that provides an overview of the business and economic landscape of college sports. This report, which uses NCAA data made available for the first time, pegs the median budget for the top 12 institutions at $83 million; the median for those schools in the lowest grouping is $14 million. The widening gap between the financially strong and weaker programs helps explain the disparity of presidential opinions on these tough issues.

The executive summary and full research report on presidents’ perceptions of the benefits and costs of intercollegiate athletics as well as College Sports 101 can be found at www.KnightCommission.org.

About the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics
The Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics was formed by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation in October 1989 in response to more than a decade of highly visible scandals in college sports. The goal of the Commission was to promote a reform agenda that emphasized academic values in a climate in which commercialization of college sports often overshadowed the underlying goals of higher education. More information about the Commission’s history including prior reports can be found at www.KnightCommission.org.

About the Presidential Survey on the Cost and Financing of Intercollegiate Athletics
The survey reports the views of presidents for the Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly Division I-A) universities on the costs and financing of intercollegiate athletics. The findings are based on 95 quantitative telephone interviews and 22 qualitative follow-up telephone interviews with presidents. The quantitative component achieved an 80 percent completion rate.  The study was conducted by Art & Science Group of Baltimore, MD, from March to July 2009.

About the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation advances journalism in the digital age and invests in the vitality of communities where the Knight brothers owned newspapers. Knight Foundation focuses on projects that promote community engagement and lead to transformational change. For more, visit www.knightfoundation.org.

About Art & Science Group
Art & Science Group specializes in market-informed strategy and planning for higher education and is one of the most highly regarded consulting firms working in the field. The firm’s practice involves close collaboration with presidents, provosts, boards of trustees, and other senior leadership of colleges and universities across the country. For more information about Art & Science Group’s work in the market-research, strategy, and planning arenas, visit www.artsci.com.

CONTACT:  Katie Reardon of Widmeyer Communications, +1-330-559-4754 (cell), Katie.Reardon@widmeyer.com

America’s Premiere High School Science Competition Announces The Class Of 2009

Semifinalists and Regional Finalists of the Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology Are Named

Regional Finals Start November 6, 2009

NISELIN, N.J., Oct. 23 /PRNewswire/ — Today, the Siemens Foundation announced the Semifinalists and Regional Finalists of the Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology, revealing the brightest high school minds in contention for the nation’s most coveted teen science prize.

The nation’s leading original research competition in math, science and technology for high school students, the Siemens Competition is administered annually by the College Board, awarding college scholarships ranging from $1,000 to $100,000 in individual and team categories. The Siemens Competition is a signature program of the Siemens Foundation, the national leader in supporting science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education with contributions surpassing $7 million each year.

A record number of 1,348 projects were received this year for the Siemens Competition, an increase of 12 percent over 2008 figures. The number of students submitting projects increased by 14 percent while more students than ever, 2,151, registered to enter. This year, 318 students were named semifinalists along with 96 students being honored as regional finalists. The combined 414 semifinalists and regional finalists hail from 34 states and the District of Columbia. The 96 regional finalist whiz kids will be called to compete at one of six regional competitions held over three consecutive weekends in November. A complete list of semifinalists and regional finalists is available at www.siemens-foundation.org.

Regional finalists will go head-to-head presenting their research with peers across the nation. Regional Finals begin on November 6, 2009. The events are hosted by six of America’s leading research universities: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (November 6-7); Georgia Institute of Technology (November 6-7); University of Notre Dame (November 13-14); University of Texas at Austin (November 13-14); Carnegie Mellon University (November 20-21) and California Institute of Technology (November 20-21).

Winners of the regional events are invited to compete at the National Finals at New York University in New York City, December 3 – December 7, 2009. Visit www.siemens-foundation.org on December 7, 2009 at 9:30 am EST to view a live webcast of the National Finalist Award Presentation. You can also log into and follow the Siemens Foundation on Twitter (http://twitter.com/SFoundation) for the latest information and announcements throughout this year’s competition.

About the Siemens Foundation

The Siemens Foundation provides more than $7 million annually in support of educational initiatives in the areas of science, technology, engineering and math in the United States. Its signature programs, the Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology and Siemens Awards for Advanced Placement, reward exceptional achievement in science, math and technology. The newest program, The Siemens We Can Change the World Challenge, encourages K-12 students to develop innovative green solutions for environmental issues. By supporting outstanding students today, and recognizing the teachers and schools that inspire their excellence, the Foundation helps nurture tomorrow’s scientists and engineers. The Foundation’s mission is based on the culture of innovation, research and educational support that is the hallmark of Siemens’ U.S. companies and its parent company, Siemens AG. For more information, visit www.siemens-foundation.org.

The College Board

The College Board is a not-for-profit membership association whose mission is to connect students to college success and opportunity. Founded in 1900, the College Board is composed of more than 5,600 schools, colleges, universities and other educational organizations. Each year, the College Board serves seven million students and their parents, 23,000 high schools, and 3,800 colleges through major programs and services in college readiness, college admissions, guidance, assessment, financial aid, enrollment, and teaching and learning. Among its best-known programs are the SAT®, the PSAT/NMSQT® and the Advanced Placement Program® (AP®). The College Board is committed to the principles of excellence and equity, and that commitment is embodied in all of its programs, services, activities and concerns. For further information, visit www.collegeboard.com.

CONTACT:  Valerie Francois, Siemens Foundation, +1-732-590-5292, valerie.francois@siemens.com; or Judy Huang, +1-212-445-8346, jyhuang@webershandwick.com, or Alex Aizenberg, +1-212-445-8414, aaizenberg@webershandwick.com, or Jennifer Moore, +1-212-445-8430, Jennifer.moore@webershandwick.com, all of Weber Shandwick

Free, Authoritative Online Science Library

Media Contact
Erin Mitchell
RLM Public Relations
scitable@RLMpr.com
(212) 741-5106 x233

Cambridge, Mass.,—October 22, 2009— Nature Education, a division of global science publisher Nature Publishing Group and creator of Scitable, the free online science learning space,  today announced availability of Essentials of Genetics, a free and authoritative mini-text on core concepts in genetics for undergraduate and high school science students. Essentials of Genetics includes clear, straightforward explanations, high quality video simulations, and links to research papers and reviews on advanced topics in genetics, all created and approved by teaching faculty.

“We want to provide students a reliable and citable online research library for term papers and exam prep,” said Nature Education Senior Vice President & Publishing Director Vikram Savkar, “and at the same time help the science come alive through high-quality visualizations.” In addition to Essentials of Genetics, Scitable features hundreds of free overviews of advanced topics in genetics, containing reliable and accurate content written and reviewed expressly for students by scientists. Students can also post questions to the Ask the Expert feature, where scientists will answer questions within 48 – 72 hours.  Active students can reach out to Scitable’s global community of faculty, researchers, and grad students to form study groups or ask advice.  Faculty may create free online research spaces for their classes in Scitable , including customizable reading lists and news feeds from major science magazines.

For more information, visit www.nature.com/scitable.

About Nature Education
Nature Education is a new division of Nature Publishing Group devoted to facilitating high quality, accessible science education in all countries of the world. Nature Education is currently focused on bringing together high quality content, a global community of faculty, researchers, and students, and technology-based learning tools to provide a powerful new generation of science learning tools for the academic and consumer community.

About Nature Publishing Group (NPG)
Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is a publisher of high impact scientific and medical information in print and online. NPG publishes journals, online databases and services across the life, physical, chemical and applied sciences and clinical medicine.Focusing on the needs of scientists, Nature (founded in 1869) is the leading weekly, international scientific journal. In addition, for this audience, NPG publishes a range of Nature research journals and Nature Reviews journals, plus a range of prestigious academic journals including society-owned publications. Online, nature.com provides over 5 million visitors per month with access to NPG publications and online databases and services, including Nature News and Nature Jobs plus access to Nature Network and Nature Education.

Throughout all its businesses NPG is dedicated to serving the scientific and medical communities and the wider scientifically interested general public. Part of Macmillan Publishers Limited, NPG is a global company with principal offices in London, New York and Tokyo, and offices in cities worldwide including Boston, Buenos Aires, Delhi, Hong Kong, Madrid, Barcelona, Munich, Heidelberg, Basingstoke, Melbourne, Paris, San Francisco, Seoul and Washington DC. For more information, please go to www.nature.com.